h4831sc for Dummies
h4831sc for Dummies
Blog Article
What is actually Anyone finding fantastic precision with for 180gr supplements and 4831? Just in search of a starting point so I don't squander a bunch of elements. Thanks for the assistance!
I'd say you would be better off looking at if another person might be willing to trade you some Varget for your H4831SC.
The point that the H4831 is indeed a slower burning powder is specifically why you're observing increased velocities received with that powder, in contrast to That which you've found with the IMR things. Also excellent powder, but fairly greater suited to a bit more compact situations using a bit much less capability.
We’d like to make sure that you’re eighteen several years of age or more mature in advance of enabling you to shop our web site. Will you be eighteen decades of age or more mature?
In any case, I realized The 2 lbs . of H4831SC made use of the identical data, but I did not know regardless of whether there was anything distinctive amongst a pound of powder labeled "Extreme" and just one not so labeled. A contact to Hodgdon confirmed they were in reality similar and the only real distinction was The emblem about the label.
Given that there won't seem like any "official" Load Data in existence for this Load, can many of you deliver a place to begin with this mix and points to consider when Doing work this Load up?
NBTs or Hornady VMax, but Use a minimal offer of Varget, plus a good deal more available H4831SC. I shoot fifty five gr. loads Practically exclusively, because that is just what the rifles shoot the top.
and it is advisable to spend money on some new load data books. powder composition and chemistry can does alter through the years. 4831 powder of several years in the past just isn't exact as what's currently available. which is why anyone seriously interested in reloading properly will have essentially the most existing load data publications h4831sc to consult with.
I have discovered the exact opposite to get legitimate in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a much faster and equally accurate powder in my 300 Win Mag.
Why would I point out this? Just h4831sc what is my issue? I'm unsure that there's a serious valid level in addition to what's well known with most hasn't been popular with me in any way in these situations. Do I just Have a very powder jinx or a little something? Just to provide you with how mad I actually am, tomorrow I'm assortment screening a good friends new .
Kansas Town, MO I'd seize regardless of what is offered at the moment. I’ve used both equally even though with my go to load and didn’t see nearly anything distinct performance clever.
I use 52 grs H4831sc that has a 117gr Hornady BTSP. It is correct, delicate mannered, and knocks whitetails down DRT. If it was me, I'd personally commence at fifty two gr and perform up.
I normally constantly obtain the sc version. Employing a powder evaluate it hangs up considerably less on account of shorter kernels and I believe allows more dependable metering so a lot less time you're taking trickling in the last little bit of charge to make pounds. So in essence the SC will save you times
I discovered that my 7mag 160 partitions were sub MOA with 4831sc with very low to min fees. I’m speaking 2700 (maybe 2800) fps, it had been a minimal 60s grain demand in h4831sc load data a very Norma situation. Not what I had been seeking, but accurate Even so.